Friday, November 23, 2007

Feliz Cumpleanos Cinco Ocho!

(Yes. I know there should be a tilde over the 'n' but I'm not smart enough to figure out how to make that happen.)




Today is Jonathan Papelbon's 27th birthday, so we have (maybe) three-year-old baby Papelbon to celebrate. Perhaps it's not a fair assumption to make, but I'm going to assume that the two of them share the same birthday. (I did, in fact, lift the photograph from outincenterfield.)

Honestly? I don't know how anyone could not adore the man. On top of his mad baseball skills, he's got a great personality. He did make those hideous car commercials and I could only stomach a little bit of the QVC (at least I think it was QVC, it might have been HSN) appearance, but I really looked forward to the Friendly's Scoop thing.


He just seems like a really great guy. Not a great guy in the same sense that Mike Lowell is a great guy but a great guy, nonetheless. Mike Lowell is a smart, suave guy; the type with whom you would have a sophisticated conversation about art and wine. Jonathan Papelbon would be great to have a beer with. Maybe wrestle some alligators.

When his shoulder finally gives out on him, I would imagine he could easily get a job in broadcasting. He'd be really fun to watch and he could live out George Costanza's dream.


George: ...you know how I always make good comments when we're watching the
game.

Jerry: Yeah. You do make good comments but they tend to give
those jobs to ex-ball players and, you know, people in broadcasting.

George: That's not really fair.

Jerry: I know.
(It's a good day when you can work a Seinfeld quote into what you're doing.)


Anyway, back to Mr. Papelbon. Many happy returns to you, sir.


Nice. Nice.

Monday, November 19, 2007

He likes it! Mikey likes it!


The deal from the Red Sox that is. He might like Life cereal too, I have no idea.

According to the Herald, the deal won't be finalized until tomorrow but the plan is to give him three years at between 36 and 39 million. ESPN is reporting that the deal is for 37.5 million. So probably 12.5 million a year. It sounds about right.

It's good to get this settled.

Good on the Front Office to sticking to their guns and not being bamboozeled by the Yankees. Good on Lowell for being such a nice guy, according to the ESPN piece, he could have gotten his four years from the Dodgers or the Phillies but he wanted to stay in Boston. Say it with me: Awww.

And now to drag out some of my favorite Lowell bits: bit one and bit two.

Friday, November 16, 2007

The Campaign for Terry


Fine. Terry didn't win American League Manager of the Year. Whatever. He doesn't need your stinkin' accolades, anyway. This year alone, he's got the best record in the American League East, an American League pennant and a World Series championship to prove to himself that he is very good at what he does. He doesn't need a stamp of approval from a bunch of baseball writers to know that.

What he does need is a raise, preferably a big one. Sure, the man already makes a boatload of money (more money than I could ever hope to make in a year) but compared to other big-market, big-league managers, it's a pittance. Back in October there were assurances that his contract would be extended. Hopefully, that extension would include a raise. On the off chance that the Front Office is actually insane and it doesn't (and because I am a good, giving, generous soul) I have decided to start a campaign.

It bears the rather unoriginal title "The Campaign for Terry"; it's single goal is to insure that Terry Francona receives the bonus that he is due.

The idea is simple. If every good and true Red Sox fan was to open his wallet and share a little bit of what he found there, then we could easily achieve our goal. There are just over fourteen million people living in New England. If even 1/10 of the population participated and threw a couple of bucks Terry's way, then we could almost double his salary for the year. And as far as I can tell, though I am by no means an accountant, the money would come to Terry as tax free gifts.

The following is the text of the note I included with my contribution:
Dear Terry:
As a long suffering member of Red Sox nation, I would like to thank you for all that you have done for our team. It is through your leadership that they were able to pull it off, not once but twice. I greatly appreciate all the hard work and dedication that you have shown. I would invite you to lunch but since you probably wouldn't accept, here's a couple of bucks. Lunch is on me.




Note: I signed the note but did not include my return address for fear that he might actually return it to me.


If you wish to join us in the cause, the address is:


Terry Francona
c/o Fenway Park
4 Yawkey Way
Boston, MA 02215


Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Some Thoughts on Mike Lowell


There's been a change in the weather. At least, that's the way it seems to me. Before contract negotiations even began (hell, before the World Series even ended), people were calling for the Front Office to re-sign Mike Lowell. Almost as soon as the duckboats returned to Fenway, though, the rumbling started and the tone of the conversation turned decidedly defeatist: "He's not coming back." "He wants four years and they're only willing to go three." "The leaking of the deal that they offered him reeks of a PR move." "How bad would A-Rod be for the clubhouse, really?" Everyone was still saying "Re-sign Lowell" but it was much quieter and most seemed willing to push him out the door.

I don't think that anyone dislikes Mike Lowell nor do I think that anyone begrudges him the opportunity to make more money by playing for another team. He seems like a good guy; genuine and decent. He's smart. He doesn't have a super-inflated ego. He's got a sense of humor and that giant grin that he was sporting in the days following the World Series was so warm, grateful, and friendly that it just invited you to smile back at him.

So why did we give up on him so easily? Because we're doom and gloom, puritanical New Englanders. Aphorisms of the New England spirit: No good deed goes unpunished; every silver lining has a dark cloud. All positive things are evened out by negative ones; don't rejoice too much in good fortune because the puritanical God (or in this case, the baseball god) is a capricious one and your luck could change with the cold November wind.

We liked losing. We were comfortable with it. Bill Buckner should be held up amongst the heroes of New England. [Aside: I think he already is, in a way. I don't know anyone who truly reviles the man and even when you hear someone mutter "Buckner" under their breath, there's affection behind it.] He affirmed for us what we already knew to be true.

The glint from the World Series trophy is like a ray of sunlight cutting through our cold, dark, gray, gloomy November and we don't know what to do with it. It's turned November on it's head. Nobody wants Mike Lowell to leave but his signing with another team would set things right.

So I'll sit here whispering "Re-sign Lowell" half hoping that they will, while the other half worries about what sort of calamity would befall us if it were to happen. Perhaps Beckett would accidentally shoot himself in the foot whilst hunting.



To be filed under: You Learn Something Knew Every Day: "Re-sign Lowell" and "Resign Lowell" do not mean the same thing.

Monday, November 12, 2007

Ave! Roy Dusty!


I couldn't resist. This movie was integral to the development of my knowledge of the fundamentals of baseball (well, this one and The Sand Lot). I watched them a lot; the videos were in pretty much constant rotation. Plus, there's a short joke to be had here. I'm sure of it.

So congratulations to Pedroia. After a shaky start, he turned in some pretty impressive numbers (.317, 8, 50). His batting average is, apparently, the all-time best for a rookie second baseman. And with a fielding percentage of .990 and just 11 errors, he also offered up some excellent defense. He seems like a scrappy guy.

Also, big ups to Ryan Braun of the Milwaukee Brewers, NL RoY. His numbers (.324, 34, 97) are impressive, as well. I'm glad it wasn't Tulowitzki because, apropos of nothing, I couldn't help but think "That man has horrific posture." every time he went up to bat.

Thursday, November 8, 2007

He did dance. Sort of.



I suppose that it counts as a dance. Um, not quite what I was expecting.

It's hard to hear around the drawl but it sounds like he says "I tell ya, I told you guys I'm dancin' with him. When-" [aside: it might be "when we win" but first, that doesn't make a whole lot of sense and second, it doesn't go with my next line. So moving on.] Unless adrenaline is the ultimate in age-defying makeup, that is not Papelbon. And Josh, kitten, you must have known that we were expecting a rowdy Papelbon-esque dance and not something akin to the way my grandfather would have whirled my grandmother around the floor.

But, nontheless, it's very, very funny and he seems very proud of himself. His partner doesn't seem to be enjoying himself as much, perhaps it's the death grip with which he is being held or maybe dancing with Josh Beckett is just a terrifying experience. The video can be seen (and immensely enjoyed) here:

And because that tickled me so much, there's another one. In the second video at about 36 seconds he does a little shimmy-thing.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Yer blind, ump! Yer blind, ump! Ya must be outta yer mind, ump!


With nothing particularly interesting happening today, I have been forced to foist my thoughts on the world regarding instant replay.


Yesterday, by a margin of 25-5, the general managers approved the use of instant replay in determining boundary calls. Basically, if the home run was questionable (it might have been foul, it might have hit the wall, the might have been touched by a fan), then the play could be subject to review. Maybe it's because I'm a baseball romantic or maybe it's because I'm from New England and, therefore, resistant to change, either way the prospect of instant replay just doesn't curl my toes.


What's the point? Over the course of 4,860 games, how many plays will it actually affect? I suppose that's why I'm more wary of the idea than vehemently against it.


When you watch a game on television, you are subjected to seemingly endless repetitions of any play that's even remotely close and all that that succeeds in making clear is that it's still a subjective call. Obviously, having better camera angles would help in calling foul balls and potential home runs; but how do you set up those cameras? Do you have a camera hanging off the top of the foul pole? Do you have one aimed along the top of the fences, on the off chance that someone might hit a potential home run right where the camera could clearly capture the image? As for fan interference, you would probably have to use the regular feed from the game and that is rarely ever useful.


Plus, call me a little bit of a masochist but I like the tension a poorly called game can cause. It's good to have a scapegoat if things aren't going well. It's better to have a situation where you end up winning no matter how much the umpire doesn't like the team. Hissy fits by managers and players are part of the game. And, if instant replay turned out to be a slippery slope and all close calls were referred to the tape, the song "Six Months Out of Every Year" wouldn't make any sense.


The plan still has to be approved by the commissioner, the umpires, and the players association. And knowing the speed at which baseball generally moves, it could be years and years before it was even close to being implemented.












Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Schilling, Ortiz, and Youk has got a golden glove (sung to the tune of "I've Got a Golden Ticket")

So much to talk about:

Schilling:


So he's back. I didn't think he would be, so good on him. Disregarding his big mouth, he seems like a good-enough guy; the type of guy you would like to have in a clubhouse. Plus, he's still a good pitcher. The deal they hammered out seems like it would be beneficial all around. He's guaranteed probably about what he's worth and if he can find away to be impressive he can get what he wanted. And maybe if he gets himself into decent shape, his fast ball might pick up a little bit of it's lost speed.

Ortiz:



He went in for arthroscopic knee surgery today. Which, as I understand it, involves trimming excess cartilage from the knee. From my limited research (i.e. I did a Google search and read one of the first articles that came up), it seems that the surgery isn't always productive and often results in the patient needing to have a full knee replacement in a few years. Let's hope that this is not the case here. Hopefully, it will make it less painful to watch him run (I was, seriously, having sympathy pains in my wonky knee watching him in the last couple of games). With reconstructed knees, it's best to put as little weight as possible on them; so perhaps there's a way to tack Schilling's weight-loss clause onto Ortiz's contract.

Youkilis:


Hooray for Youk and his Gold Glove! One thousand and eighty chances to make an error and he got away clean from all of them. It is an impressive feat. As much as I admire Youkilis, though (and I do), I love Coco Crisp. And Crisp was robbed of his award. It is a joy to watch Crisp play and there is no way that Grady Sizemore was a better defensive player than he was. The fact that he didn't have much offensive output shouldn't have had any bearing on an award for defense. And just because he is fun to watch:




Monday, November 5, 2007

Wakefield and Mirabelli: Hand-in-hand?

First, I just thought it was important to point out how much Theo looks like George Clooney in the above picture.

More Importantly: I wasn't going to post anything about potential trade rumors. They're just rumors and by the awesome power of my mind I might make a seemingly bad deal come true, so it would be better to just shut up about it. That being said: Since Wakefield is in, does that mean that Mirabelli is in as well?

There must be someone better out there. Someone who could put up some offense would be the way to go. In the words of David Ortiz, "Theo, do it!"

How hard can catching a ball be, anyway? This, coming from the gal who if a ninety-mile-an-hour baseball was hurled at her head would probably let out an "Eep!" and get the hell out of the way. And if, by some miracle, I did manage to hold my ground and catch it, I would probably end up knocked over by the impact of the ball. We are, of course, ignoring the fact that, due to my lack of height, I probably wouldn't be anywhere near any major leaguer's strike zone (T-ball might be a possibility, if they had a need for catchers) and the only pitches that wouldn't go soaring over my head (and into the umpire) would be breaking balls in the dirt.

I decided long ago that I wasn't tough enough for baseball. True story: When my brother was in Little League, we (my brother, my mother, and myself) used to go out to the backyard and practice fielding. My mother would pitch, I would bat, and my brother would field. I was pretty good, I could pull the ball in different directions and such; it was my mom pitching though, so they weren't difficult pitches to hit. Anyway, one day she hit me with a pitch (I think she thought I was crowding the plate) and I was done. Haven't played since.



Just for reference and who couldn't use a little George to brighten their day?

Saturday, November 3, 2007

Manny and Ortiz do late night



So Manny was on the Tonight Show last night. I'll admit that I was nervous for him, given that he doesn't really talk to the media but he did alright (though I suppose Leno wasn't going to attack him and try to make him look bad). They talked about the state of sport in Boston, cars, Manny got off a couple of chin jokes, and "Manny being Manny." And he got to fist bump a very bemused looking Steve Carell.

Then David Ortiz showed up on Conan, wearing a jacket that he could easily have bedazzled himself. He was his usual amusing self. They talked about where "Big Papi" comes from, Halloween, the importance of re-signing Mike Lowell. The most amusing thing, in a very entertaining interview, was that apparently David Ortiz tells the media at the end of a presser to "go home and get some ass."

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Papelbon on Letterman



I don't know much about Jonathan Papelbon. I do know that he has often inspired concern in me along the lines of: What is that man on? But not last night. Last night on Letterman, he seemed like a fun, happy, witty guy. He seemed almost normal.

He did well (perhaps his internal editor could be a little quicker on the uptake) but he held his own. I wish I could remember more clearly (but The Late Show is, in fact, on late and I've been behind on my sleep this week). I was hoping to include the clip but no one seems to have seen fit to grab it off the show. Anyway, he talked about pitching, dancing, and how he feels about players from other teams.

There were two flashes of brilliance. The first was when he was talking about being on deck and being pretty sure that if he had to hit, he was going to go deep. A nice moment of self-deprecation there. The second was when he (hopefully) coined a new nickname for David Ortiz. Because, how awesome would it be if next season you heard: "The designated hitter tonight, David 'The Bedazzler' Ortiz"? Pretty awesome.

Other than that, it was sort of banal. Which is kind of disappointing for my adrenaline-junkie closer (but also a little bit comforting). I don't think he lived in Louisiana for very long but I had developed an image of him as a crazy Cajun. The kind who would play chicken in a fan-boat, or who would pole a pirogue out into the bayou for the express purpose of getting lost and then finding his way out Survivor-man-style. In my head, he wrestled alligators.

Turns out, he's just a nice normal guy. Oh well. Guess it makes life easier for his wife. I was a little worried about how she was going to deal with the insane person living in my head.